Golf News: President's Cup 2021
____________________________________________________________________________________
TOWN MATTERS
Town Supervisor Wehrheim Proposes A 22% Salary Increase For Himself
TOS Officials Say Kings Park Is The Answer To Downtown Smithtown’s Sewage Problem
Nissequogue River State Park Master Plan Draft To Be Released In June
Transformation Of Nissequogue River State Park Has Begun With York Hall Roof Rebuild
Smithtown’s Fields of Dreams Becomes Reality
A Lot To Think About In Smithtown’s Revamped Master Plan
Kings Park Gets A New 23 Parking Space Municipal Parking Lot
Traffic In Smithtown Is About To Get Worse
Lake Avenue Smithtown’s 8.2 Million Dollar Road
What’s Happening In Smithtown? Hauppauge Industrial Park Rezoning
Traffic In Smithtown Is Likely To Get Worse
OP ED - Comments On Proposed Subdivision Of Gyrodyne Property
Smithtown’s Master Plan Moving Forward Despite Setbacks
Well they did it again! This time the 10-year-olds are heading to Rochester to play in the State Championship!
SUFFOLK CLOSEUP
By Karl Grossman
Suffolk County’s challenge to helium-filled balloons as an environmental menace began in 2005—and has continued and expanded since. Initially, the focus was on the release of more than 25 or more balloons. Then, two years ago, the Suffolk Legislature enacted a law barring the “intentional release” of even one balloon.
Two years ago, a shift began to also consider a ban on the sale and distribution of helium-filled and other gas-filled lighter-than-air balloons. The Town of Southampton passed a law on this last month, to take effect next year. The Town of East Hampton is now drafting a comparable statute.
Meanwhile, a leading force in Suffolk in recent times in taking on balloons, East Hampton Town Trustee Susan McGraw-Keber, has been endeavoring to get a law prohibiting the release of such balloons passed on the New York State level. State lawmakers she has been working with include Assemblyman Fred W. Thiele, Jr. and Senator Anthony Palumbo who have drawn up legislation.
Ms. McGraw-Keber intends to move on—following the balloon trajectory in Suffolk—to seeking a state ban on sale and distribution.
All along, there’s been resistance to the drive in Suffolk by an entity representing the balloon business, The Balloon Council, based in New Jersey. As Southampton Town considered its sale and distribution ban, Lorna O’Hara, public information director of The Balloon Council was there (on Zoom due to the pandemic) asserting that the proposed law was “misguided” and “will cause economic harm to Southampton businesses.”
Ms. McGraw-Keber’s rebuttal: “This is a pro-environment and marine and wildlife and fisheries effort.” Also, she cited the claim by bar and restaurant owners decades ago that bans on smoking in bars and restaurants would devastate their businesses. “That never happened,” she noted, “and people can eat and drink in clean air.”
The initiative started in 2005 after Suffolk Legislator Lynne Nowick of St. James received a letter from a group of elementary school students about helium-filled balloons falling into waterways and being mistaken for jellyfish by sea animals, especially turtles, that ingested them and died. The students cited a law in Connecticut banning the mass release of balloons. Ms. Nowick (now a Smithtown councilperson) introduced a bill in Suffolk to prohibit that here. The Balloon Council tried to defeat the measure. However, public officials here stood up to The Balloon Council and her bill barring the release of 25 or more balloons was passed.
In 2019, that number was reduced to zero. “One balloon released is one too many,” said the author of the new measure, Suffolk Legislator Sarah Anker of Mount Sinai, whom Ms. McGraw-Keber had met with and gotten into the issue.
Ms. McGraw-Keber was inspired herself to get involved in the balloon issue in 2018 when Colleen Henn, then coordinator of the Eastern Long Island Chapter of the Surfrider Foundation, came to a meeting of the East Hampton Trustees “and asked if we would be interested in supporting a ban on the intentional release of balloons in East Hampton. I’m a PADI certified Rescue Scuba Diver and First Responder and I see what goes on in the ocean. I immediately jumped on board. It’s a common sense effort to help eliminate balloon debris in our waterways and overall environment.”
As a member of the Education Committee on the Trustees she visits schools. She
relates going to a science fair at the Montauk School and giving a presentation about damage caused by balloons. Students and teachers at the school sent a petition to the East Hampton Town Board calling for action. “Children understand the balloon problem well,” says Ms. McGraw-Keber. “They are the future leaders and stewards of our communities and our environment.”
Meanwhile, like the tobacco industry years ago pushing certain filter cigarettes as “safer,” The Balloon Council is now touting latex balloons over those of the plastic mylar. “Latex balloons are produced from the sap of the rubber tree. It is collected” on a “process similar to that used for collecting the sap from maple trees for syrup,” thus “a latex balloon is…100 percent biodegradable,” its website claims. https://www.theballooncouncil.org/
“That’s not true,” says Ms. McGraw-Keber. “While latex is a natural product, once it is made into a commercial product it’s not biodegradable. It’s as bad as mylar which is made from petroleum, a fossil fuel.”
Florida-based Balloons Blow declares: “Latex balloons are not ‘biodegradable’…This is just a marketing gimmick.” It cites the addition of “chemicals, plasticizers and artificial dyes” in latex balloons. On its website—http://www.balloonsblow.org—it shows photos of latex balloons not having broken down after years. Indeed, it notes: “Latex balloons are the type most commonly found in the stomachs of dead animals.”
Karl Grossman is a veteran investigative reporter and columnist, the winner of numerous awards for his work and a member of the L.I. Journalism Hall of Fame. He is a professor of journalism at SUNY/College at Old Westbury and the author of six books.
SUFFOLK CLOSEUP
By Karl Grossman
The Long Island Power Authority (LIPA) and Public Service Enterprise Group (PSEG) quietly, behind closed doors and with the involvement of a top state energy official—the chief executive of the state’s Department of Public Service—agreed on a settlement last week allowing PSEG to continue to operate Long Island’s electric grid to 2025.
This happened despite a contingent of state lawmakers from Long Island signing a letter to Governor Andrew Cuomo calling on LIPA to “terminate its contract with PSEG LI as soon as possible and become a true public power company.” The 15 called on LIPA to operate the Long Island’s electric grid itself, not contract out the responsibility. They included State Senator Anthony H. Palumbo of New Suffolk and, from the Assembly, Fred W. Thiele, Jr of Sag Harbor; Steve Englebright of Setauket; Phil Ramos of Brentwood; Steve Stern of Dix Hills; and Kimberly Jean-Pierre of Wheatley Heights. “Across the country, publicly owned utilities have proven more affordable and reliable…are more responsive to customer needs,” they said.
It happened despite a $70 million “breach-of-contract” lawsuit LIPA brought against PSEG in December charging the Newark, New Jersey-based private company with “grossly negligent performance” in dealing with Tropical Storm Isaias last year. Some 535,000 LIPA customers were left without electricity, some for more than a week. The LIPA suit accused PSEG of “corporate mismanagement, misfeasance, incompetence and indifference, rising well beyond the level of simple negligence.”
It happened despite the overwhelming percentage of people speaking at public hearings held recently by LIPA on its future testifying that that it should operate the Long Island electric grid itself and not continue with PSEG. “We need to revamp the entire structure,” said Laura McKellar of Greenlawn. Indeed, at that May hearing LIPA CEO Tom Falcone spoke of PSEG’s “sub-par” performance in Isaias and went on to say that that deeper “management failures” at PSEG had since been discovered. Mr. Falcone said: “It’s time for a course correction.”
The new LIPA contract agreement with PSEG came about without transparency. As Mark Harrington wrote in Newsday last week, it was “reached early Sunday morning.” And, he reported, “The settlement terms were reached by officials at the highest levels of Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo’s Department of Public Service, including DPS chief executive John Howard.”
Mr. Howard was appointed to that post by Governor Cuomo in February and, at the same time, designated by the governor to be chair of the New York State Public Service Commission. Mr. Howard praised the new contract as an “historic agreement.”
Mr. Thiele is calling on LIPA’s trustees to reject the deal. A key problem, however, is that Governor Cuomo appoints five of LIPA’s nine trustees. Mr. Thiele emphasized how for months there has been analyses and hearings about the future of LIPA and it seemed “we were headed toward a favorable decision in regard to public power’—for LIPA to itself run the Long Island electric grid. “And then the governor injected himself and the process was short-circuited—and this contract falls out of the sky.”
“The legislature needs to get involved with this—how this deal came about,” declared Mr. Thiele. And he said he and Mr. Englebright, who is also chair of the Assembly’s Environmental Conservation Committee, are discussing, for starters, legislative hearings.
“The agreement between LIPA and PSEG-LI reached behind closed doors this past Sunday marks still another betrayal of LIPA’s ratepayers,” he said in a written statement. The “original vision” for LIPA under the Long Island Power Act of 1985 was for “a full public power company accountable directly to the people of Long Island.” It “is clear that the third-party service contract model is a failure. It lacks oversight, transparency, and accountability. No other utility in the nation even has such a convoluted management structure.”
In Newsday, Mr. Englebright, referring to the governor, spoke of “the apparent manipulation of this issue from an invisible puppet master.” Also, it was reported that the governor’s office didn’t “provide a comment to criticism of the deal.”
Organizations led by the Long Island Progressive Coalition, in the forefront in seeking that LIPA get rid of PSEG and becoming a full public utility, issued a statement declaring: “It seems that Gov. Andrew Cuomo has made a deliberate choice to ignore the stated preferences of Long Island ratepayers and elected officials, and instead decided to exert his influence in this moment on behalf of PSEG.”
Also, simultaneous with extending the PSEG contract, LIPA last week agreed to settle its $70 million breach-of-contract lawsuit against PSEG for $30 million.
Karl Grossman is a veteran investigative reporter and columnist, the winner of numerous awards for his work and a member of the L.I. Journalism Hall of Fame. He is a professor of journalism at SUNY/College at Old Westbury and the author of six books.